Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kraft, P.
Right arrow Articles by Loeb, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kraft, P.
Right arrow Articles by Loeb, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, 433-441, 1996
© 1996 Oxford University Press


other

On the replicability and correlates of the Parent Health Locus of Control Scales

P. Kraft and M. Loeb1

Research Centre for Health Promotion, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen 5007 Bergen
1Department for Health Promotion, National Institute of Public Health 0462 Oslo, Norway

This study examined the replicability, psychometric properties and socio-demographic correlates of the Parent Health Locus of Control Scales (PHLOC). The original 30-item English version of the PHLOC instrument was translated and applied to a Norwegian sample. The subjects were (1) 1058 mothers of 2-year-old children and residing in the county of Sogn and Fjordane (the total response rate to the survey was 72.9%), and (2) 322 mothers of similar children residing in the neighbouring county of More and Romsdal (response rate 69.7%). Data were collected by means of self-administered questionnaires, and analysed by means of principal component analysis, varimax rotated factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The results identified six sub-factors of the PHLOC instrument. The sub-factors reflected beliefs in Parental, Child, Divine, Fate, Media and Professional Influence over child health. Adequate internal consistency of the sub-scales was observed as a general finding, while the data also suggested further refinement or exclusion of several items. The data pointed to educational differences in control beliefs among parents. The better educated perceived Media and Parental Influence to be more important, and Fate and Professional Influence to be less important, compared to those less educated. In summary, the study supports the cultural correspondence of the PHLOC instrument, several aspects of its validity and the internal consistency of the subscales. However, further research is recommended as regards the validity of PHLOC relative to an external criterion.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.