Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Janz, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Israel, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Janz, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Israel, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Health Education Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, 163-177, 1995
© 1995 Oxford University Press


research-article

Staff stress in AIDS prevention and service organizations: implications for health education practice

N. K. Janz, P. A. Wren and B. A. Israel

Health Behavior and Health Education Department, School of Public Health, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA

The purpose of this study was to identify the frequency of staff stressors and their association with programmatic factors in 51 AIDS prevention and service projects funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The methodology included both quantitative (i.e. closed-ended survey questions) and qualitative (i.e. in-depth, open-ended interviews) data to identify the important sources of staff stress. The findings suggest that staff working in AIDS prevention and service projects perceive significant levels of stress regardless of project focus. The most frequently reported staff stresses were too much work, rapid organizational growth, burnout, and problems with staff retention and communication. Among the issues rarely reported as a source of staff stress were too little work, discomfort with the target population and personal health risk concerns. The programmatic factor most often associated with staff stress was obtaining additional funding. Health education interventions need to take a comprehensive approach that includes altering the psychosocial-environmental conditions that give rise to stressors and strengthening the individual and organizational factors that may modify the effects of stress on the AIDS workforce.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.